The thing that stands out to me as a non-American is the use of the word “consumer”.
It a euphemism for a paying customer that has become normalised to the point people use it for “the general public” in any context.
Who would call victims, “consumers” ?
Not to nit-pick, but consumer is someone who consumes. I consume TWiT content but don’t pay for it. I agree though they could have used a better word. Or just dropped “for Consumers.”
The headline of the article of click bate too. It’s an Alphabet company that is working on the portal. Don’t most of us still call it all Google. It’s not “This Week in Alphabet.”
I agree with your definition, which is why I said it is a euphemism.
It is a misused word, because single celled creatures consume just the same as us.
This is why every time I hear Leo call the listeners “consumers” I cringe, because he is as blinded by it as most.
We do not consume or digest media, as it still exists after we have partaken of it.
We do buy food to consume, but that makes us customers (as I said) not consumers.
Calling humans consumers has as much point as calling them breathers, as it is an inherent part of being a living biological entity.
Consumers is only a word that a society that sees everything as disposable and temporary could use in such a way.
A society that sees the price of life on everything would use the word in such a way.
It was noticed at the local University that gradually they have been referring to the students as customers and consumers.
The rot is in many places and so normalised.
Consumer is a perfectly acceptable word in the context it’s most often used.
The public, the general public, average users, people using something in a non-professional capacity.
It all pretty much means the same thing. Consumer is just an easy single word to wrap it all up.