SN 209 (2009): Vitamin D

Back in August of 2009 – before Security Now was netcast on video – SN 209 discussed Vitamin D. I’m a long time listener, but I don’t remember that episode. @Leo rebroadcast it as SN 540 during the 2015 holiday season; I paid attention that time (TWIT TV archive, YouTube Archive, GRC transcript, GRC VitD health archive).Thanks to both of you for sharing this more than once! :slight_smile:

Knowledge has expanded tremendously since 2009. I’ll cite just one paper: Association of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations With All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality Among Adult Patients With Existing Cardiovascular Disease (2021) . This paper has the following graph:


The units of Vitamin D blood concentration are in nmol/L; we use ng/ml in the US. To convert, divide the nmol/L value by 2.5. The right edge of this chart is 60ng/ml. On the left side, 25nmol/l is 10ng/ml. Lowering the hazard ratio is a good thing; the P-value of this study is extremely low; that means the data quality is high. Please read the science paper before coming to any conclusions! I also recommend viewing John Campbell’s reading of parts of this paper on YouTube. In general, all of Campbell’s Vitamin D videos are excellent. There’s a standing joke for VitD enthusiasts: what if some [patented pharmaceutical] medicine had this much of a profound positive impact on our health?

My recommendations: get tested. Pester your doctor; your doctor should be able to order a VitD blood test. Alternatively, use private blood-testing services (either mail-order or walk-in) that process your sample in a lab and give you a report. Find a level of supplementation that works for you. The US RDA is 600IU/day for adults. That seems low/anemic/rickety for most people, but – again – please get tested to know for sure. During the pandemic Anthony Fauci noted that he supplements with 6000IU/day; your mileage may vary. The Vitamin D Council recommends test results in of 50ng/ml. Other sources recommend in the range of 40-80ng/ml. The VitD Council also curates a great variety of science papers showing the benefit of Vitamin D for particular health concerns. Who other than the VitD Council knew that raising VitD levels had a positive health impact on Acne?

During my VitD education, a burning question has emerged. Nature has been using Vitamin D for approximately one billion years; it’s been used for complex life functions (including immune regulation) since the Cambrian Explosion ~530 million years ago. Why is life – all plant and animal life – dependent on this molecule? Nature made all species on earth in the last 530 million years; isn’t the production of Vitamin D activated through sunlight – a tiny range of frequencies of UVB light – a rather fragile thing? In all that time, couldn’t the blind watchmaker have hacked together a better solution?

To make VitD, there must be a cleavage of the chemical bond between carbon molecules 9 and 10 of the B-ring of 7-dehydrocholesterol. No other bond must be altered! This change gives the molecule the ability be a “key”: to flex/distort and enter the nucleus of our cells acquire DNA sequence to express certain proteins. This VitD geometry has to be something fundamental to the geometry of our cell/nucleus walls, because nature never found anything else to do the job. If anyone knows more details – or has found a precise explanation on an AI – I’d love to hear about it.

A recent book discussed a frightening prospect: what happens when an enormous volcanic blast or an asteroid collision winds up blocking much UVB radiation for a period of months or even years? How would we maintain our health? How could plant/animal life in general survive? Wouldn’t viruses and other diseases ravage that immune-compromised world? Are any of the planet’s past extinction events linked to a global shortage of Vitamin D? I’m just starting to read; I’ll note what I find.

You two planted some seeds. Are you happy now, Steve/Leo? :slight_smile: